Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ruth Hancock v. Target Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 15, 2013

RUTH HANCOCK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TARGET CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT [Dkt. No. 20]

Presently before the court is Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement. The settlement agreement provides that "the parties have determined through information provided by [Plaintiff] . . . that the conditional payments made on behalf of [Plaintiff] related to this claim are approximately $tbd." (Mot., Ex. A) (first emphasis added). While it appears that Plaintiff attempted to provide conditional payment information, the letter submitted to Defendant referenced an incident separate and apart from that at issue here. It does not appear that Plaintiff has yet provided Defendant with the information necessary to process the settlement payment. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130115

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.