UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 15, 2013
J. STOCKBRIDGE, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONv. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN ORDER REVOKING IFP STATUS (Doc. 114) TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Michael Contreraz, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 14, 2006. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed on February 3, 2009, against Defendants Stockbridge-Cota,*fn1 Rodriguez, Franco, Davis, and Carlos for violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. On December 11, 2012, Defendants filed a motion for an order revoking Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Local Rule 230(l). Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the action, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.