Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Klamath Riverkeeper v. Montague Water Conservation District

January 15, 2013

KLAMATH RIVERKEEPER,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MONTAGUE WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT,
DEFENDANT.
KARUK TRIBE,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MONTAGUE WATER CONSERVATION 2013 DISTRICT,
DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Morrison C. England

Consolidated Cases

JOINT OBJECTIONS TO PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND STIPULATED REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATE; ORDER Settlement Conference Date: April 4, 2013 New Settlement Conference Date: April 11,

Time: 9:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 26, 8th floor

STIPULATION

Pursuant to this Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order ("Order") directing the parties to file objections to the Order no later than seven court days of service of the Order, Klamath Riverkeeper and the Karuk Tribe ("Plaintiffs") and Montague Water Conservation District ("Defendant") (collectively "the Parties") submit this joint request that this Court reschedule the Settlement Conference and the corresponding confidential settlement conference statement deadline.

WHEREAS, on December 20, 2012, this Court issued an Order. In the Order, this Court set the Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for April 4, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. and ordered that the confidential settlement conference statement be submitted to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Claire not later than March 28, 2013. ECF Dkt. No. 20.

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant is unavailable on April 4, 2013, and asked Plaintiffs to join it in requesting an alternative date for the Settlement Conference.

WHEREAS, the second paragraph of Section XI. of the Order (lines 10-13) states that "Each party is directed to have a principle capable of disposition at the Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms at the Settlement Conference." Id.

WHEREAS, L.R. 270(f)(1) provides that "When settlement must be approved by a vote of a party's governing body, unless specifically permitted otherwise by the Judge or Magistrate Judge conducting the settlement conference, counsel shall be designated or shall be accompanied in person by a representative designated by the body who shall have learned the body's preconference disposition relative to settlement."

WHEREAS, all Parties to this action require that any settlement be approved by a vote of the governing body and therefore will ensure a designated representative as provided for in L.R. 270(f)(1) attends the Settlement Conference.

WHEREAS, the Parties have not requested or obtained any prior extension of time.

WHEREAS, rescheduling the Settlement Conference and associated deadline will not affect any other scheduled dates.

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs contacted the Honorable Allison Claire's chambers on December 26, 2012 regarding available dates for the Settlement Conference, and Magistrate Judge Claire's Courtroom Deputy indicated that Magistrate Judge Claire is available for ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.