UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
January 16, 2013
ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. AND ASETEK A/S,
COOLIT SYSTEMS INC.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Edward M. ChenUnited States District Judge
STIPULATED REQUEST TO SEAL COURTROOM DURING MOTIONS HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Date: January 17, 2013 Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom: 5, 17th Floor Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
2 request to seal the courtroom during oral argument on two motions
which involve confidential 3 information that was previously filed
under seal by Order of the Court. 4
and a motion to dismiss this action, both set for hearing on January
17, 2013 at 1:30 P.M. 6
CoolIT duly submitted motions and declarations to seal evidence submitted in support of both 7 motions, and the Court granted both motions to seal [Dkt. Nos. 42 and 46]. Plaintiffs Asetek 8
As explained in more detail below, the parties to this action hereby submit this stipulated
More specifically, Defendant CoolIT Systems Inc. "("CoolIT") has filed a motion to stay
Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S ("Asetek") also duly submitted a motion and declaration to seal 9 evidence submitted in support of its opposition to CoolIT's motion to stay, and the Court granted 10 that motion to seal as well [Dkt. No. 45]. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that at the 11 time of the hearing on CoolIT's motions, the Court reserve this matter for last on its motion 12 calendar and seal the Courtroom before any of the parties' confidential information is disclosed 13 on the record. 14
15 in the filing of this Stipulation. 16 17
By his signature below, counsel for Plaintiffs attests that counsel for Defendant concurs
Dated: January 15, 2013 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP By: /s/ Robert F. McCauley Robert F. McCauley Attorneys for Plaintiffs Asetek A/S and Asetek Holdings, Inc. Dated: January 15, 2013 COOLEY LLP 24 By: /s/ Daniel J. Knauss Daniel J. Knauss Attorneys for Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, the Stipulation is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS SO ORDERED
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.