UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 16, 2013
CARLOS RICKY GONZALES,
MARTIN D. BITTER, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Barbara A. McAuliffe United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE TO ADDRESS CLAIM THREE OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [Doc. 14]
Petitioner is proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge. Local Rule 305(b).
On September 28, 2012, the undersigned issued an order denying in part the petition for writ of habeas corpus. All of the claims raised in the petition were denied on the merits except Petitioner's claim challenging the dismissal of Juror No. 32 in which it was determined that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel represent Petitioner to further develop the claim. On October 23, 2012, Carolyn D. Phillips was appointed to represent Petitioner.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Within forty-five (45) days from the date of service of this order Petitioner shall file a response to Respondent's answer addressing the merits of Petitioner's challenge to the right to a fair trial; and
2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of Petitioner's response Respondent shall file a reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.