Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Jeremy Thomas Boze

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 17, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
JEREMY THOMAS BOZE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

AMENDED ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL CONFIRMATION AND JURY TRIAL DATES;EXCLUDING TIME Date: April 5, 2013 Time: 9:00 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, MICHELLE A. PRINCE, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and LINDA C. HARTER, Chief Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for Defendant, that the Trial-Confirmation hearing date of February 1, 2013 and Jury Trial date of February 19, 2013 be vacated, and the matter rescheduled for Trial-Confirmation hearing on April 5, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. and Jury Trial on April 30, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

Additional time is requested for further investigation of the charges, and to accommodate the attorneys' schedules.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Public Defender /s/ Linda C. Harter LINDA C. HARTER Chief Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant JEREMY BOZE Dated: January 17, 2013 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/Michelle A. Prince MICHELLE A. PRINCE Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff

Based upon the foregoing, the parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including April 5, 2013 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation. Dated: January 17, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through April 5, 2013.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge

20130117

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.