Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tessera, Inc v. Spansion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 18, 2013

TESSERA, INC.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
SPANSION, LLC; SPANSION, INC; NOS. 1122 IN CASE 8 SPANSION TECHNOLOGY, INC.;
AND ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR 238 IN CASE NO. 9 ENGINEERING, INC.; ASE (U.S.), 12-692) INC.; CHIPMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 10 CHIPMOS U.S.A., INC.; SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.; STMICROELECTRONICS N.V.; CHIPPAC, INC.; STATS CHIPPAC 13 (BVI), LTD.; AND STATS CHIPPAC, LTD., 14
DEFENDANTS.
TESSERA, INC.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MOTOROLA, INC.; QUALCOMM, INC.; FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; AND ATI TECHNOLOGIES, ULC, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Claudia Wilken United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING TESSERA'S MOTION 6 TO AMEND THE CASE MANAGEMENT AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Plaintiff Tessera, Inc. moves to modify the case management 25 order in the above-captioned cases. Defendants Qualcomm Inc., 26 Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd., Siliconware USA, Inc., 27 STATS ChipPAC, Inc., STATS ChipPAC (BVI) Limited, STATS ChipPAC, 28 Ltd., Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.,

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.; SCHEDULE (Docket SILICONWARE USA, INC.;

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.; STATS

1 ATI Technologies ULC, ASE (U.S.), Inc., ChipMOS U.S.A., Inc., 2 ChipMOS Technologies, Inc., ChipMOS Technologies (Bermuda) Ltd., 3 STMicroelectronics, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V. oppose 4 Tessera's motion. 5 Tessera seeks to continue the fact discovery deadline by 6 three months and to make further changes to subsequent deadlines. 7 Tessera first presented its motion to the Special Master, who 8 granted a one-month extension to the fact discovery deadline and 9 extended the dates for opening and rebuttal expert reports. 10 Having reviewed the papers submitted by the parties, the Court 11 finds that the changes made to the case management schedule by the 12 Special Master, who has tremendous familiarity with the history of discovery in these cases, were well-considered and proper, and 14 that Tessera has not presented good cause to further modify the 15 schedule at this time. Accordingly, Tessera's motion is DENIED 16 (Docket Nos. 1122 in Case No. 05-4063 and 238 in Case No. 12-692) 17 and the Special Master's order is affirmed. 18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130118

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.