Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re: Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation v. Au Optronics Corporation

January 24, 2013

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. PLAINTIFF,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, ET AL., 25 DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Honorable Susan Y. Illston

HOLLY A. HOUSE (SB# 136045) hollyhouse@paulhastings.com KEVIN C. McCANN (SB# 120874) kevinmccann@paulhastings.com 2 SEAN D. UNGER (SB# 231694) seanunger@paulhastings.com PAUL HASTINGS LLP 3 55 Second Street Twenty-Fourth Floor 4 San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 5 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 6 LEE F. BERGER (SB# 222756) leeberger@paulhastings.com PAUL HASTINGS LLP 7 875 15th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20005 8 Telephone: (202) 551-1772 Facsimile: (202) 551-0172 9 Attorneys for Defendants 10 LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. 11 12

This Document Relates to Individual Case

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER INCORPORATING AND No. 12-cv-00335 SI: APPLYING BRIEFING FROM OTHER 21

MDL CASES INTO VIEWSONIC VIEWSONIC CORPORATION, CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS 22 DEFENDANTS AND LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC.'S COUNTERCLAIMS AND DEFENSES CONCERNING DUPLICATIVE RECOVERY

Plaintiff ViewSonic Corporation ("Plaintiff") and Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. (collectively, "LG Display") stipulate as follows: 3

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint (the "Complaint") in Case No. 3:12-cv-0335 SI (N.D. Cal.) on October 8, 2012; 5

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (the "Motion") on October 22, 2012 (MDL Dkt. No. 7023); 7

WHEREAS, the Court granted the Motion in part and denied it in part on November 28, 2012 (MDL Dkt. No. 7255); 9 10 declaratory relief and certain affirmative defenses relating to issues of "duplicative recovery" (the 11

WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to file a motion to dismiss the Counterclaims;

WHEREAS, the Court has granted motions to dismiss the Counterclaims in other cases, 14 see D.I. 5795 (Court's order denying leave to amend LG Display's Answers to include the 15 Counterclaims in various other TFT-LCD panel litigation MDL actions); D.I. 6833 (Court's order 16 granting several direct action plaintiffs' motion to dismiss LG Display's counterclaims and strike 17 their defenses regarding duplicative recovery); D.I. 7512 (Court's order granting Rockwell's 18 motion to dismiss LG Display's counterclaims and strike their defenses regarding duplicative 19 recovery) (together the "Orders"); 20 21 in the Tech Data case, 3:11-cv-05765-SI, D.I. 7090; 22 23 duplicative recovery defenses and counterclaims have no legal basis, see Orders (finding that LG 24 Display had not provided a legal basis for its proposed "violation of laws of duplicative recovery" 25 defenses or its related counterclaims); 26

WHEREAS, LG Display answered the Complaint and asserted counterclaims for "Counterclaims") on December 19, 2012 (MDL Dkt. No. 7384); 12

WHEREAS, a similar motion to dismiss the Counterclaims is currently before the Court

WHEREAS, LG Display wishes to preserve its right to appeal the Court's ruling that its

WHEREAS, the parties seek to avoid further briefing in this case regarding the Counterclaims, and thus seek to have the Court rule on Plaintiff's motion to dismiss on the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.