UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division
January 25, 2013
ROBERT W. CRITCHLOW,
KATE E. CRITCHLOW, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND JOHN A. WANER, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND DOES 1-50, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Laurel Beeler United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S
On January 7, 2013, Defendants Kate Critchlow and John Waner filed
separate motions to
18 dismiss Plaintiff Robert Critchlow's Second Amended Complaint. See
ECF Nos. 43 & 44. On 19 January 22, 2013, the day his opposition
briefing was due, Plaintiff filed a stipulation and proposed
20 order requesting a two-day extension and seeking leave to exceed
the page limits in his briefing. See 21 Stipulation with Proposed
Order, ECF No. 45. The stipulation and proposed order was unclear 22
about the number of additional pages requested. See Id. 23 That day,
the court granted Plaintiff's request for more time. See Order, ECF
No. 46. With 24 regard to the additional pages, the court denied the
motion "to the extent it [sought] leave to exceed 25 the page limits
for two separate opposition briefs" and granted the motion "[t]o the
extent it [sought] 26 leave to file one combined opposition brief of
up to 32 pages . . . ." Order, ECF No. 46 at 2. 27 Plaintiff timely
filed a combined opposition brief on January 24, 2013. See ECF No. 47.
The 28 opposition exceeds the allowed page limit and contains no table
of contents or table of authorities as
1 required by Civil Local Rule 7-4(a)(2). Accordingly, the court
STRIKES the opposition brief.
2 Plaintiff has until 2:00 p.m. today, January 25, 2013, to file an opposition that fully complies with 3 the local rules and this court's order. Defendants' reply deadlines remain the same.
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.