Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Robert W. Critchlow v. Kate E. Critchlow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division


January 25, 2013

ROBERT W. CRITCHLOW,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
KATE E. CRITCHLOW, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND JOHN A. WANER, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND DOES 1-50, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Laurel Beeler United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S

On January 7, 2013, Defendants Kate Critchlow and John Waner filed separate motions to 18 dismiss Plaintiff Robert Critchlow's Second Amended Complaint. See ECF Nos. 43 & 44. On 19 January 22, 2013, the day his opposition briefing was due, Plaintiff filed a stipulation and proposed 20 order requesting a two-day extension and seeking leave to exceed the page limits in his briefing. See 21 Stipulation with Proposed Order, ECF No. 45. The stipulation and proposed order was unclear 22 about the number of additional pages requested. See Id. 23 That day, the court granted Plaintiff's request for more time. See Order, ECF No. 46. With 24 regard to the additional pages, the court denied the motion "to the extent it [sought] leave to exceed 25 the page limits for two separate opposition briefs" and granted the motion "[t]o the extent it [sought] 26 leave to file one combined opposition brief of up to 32 pages . . . ." Order, ECF No. 46 at 2. 27 Plaintiff timely filed a combined opposition brief on January 24, 2013. See ECF No. 47. The 28 opposition exceeds the allowed page limit and contains no table of contents or table of authorities as 1 required by Civil Local Rule 7-4(a)(2). Accordingly, the court STRIKES the opposition brief.

2 Plaintiff has until 2:00 p.m. today, January 25, 2013, to file an opposition that fully complies with 3 the local rules and this court's order. Defendants' reply deadlines remain the same.

4 IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130125

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.