UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 28, 2013
SANDRA VIENS AND LAWRENCE VIENS,
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. D/B/A STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS; STRYKER CORPORATION; STRYKER SALES CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANT(S).
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joseph C. Spero Judge
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiffs Sandra Viens and Lawrence Viens ("Plaintiffs") 25 and Defendants Howmedica Osteonics Corp (sued as Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker 26 Orthopaedics), Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation (collectively "Defendants"), 27 by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to a thirty (30) day extension of time 28 for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Accordingly, Defendants shall have until, 2 and including, February 25, 2013, to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. 3
So Stipulated. 4 DATED: January 25, 2013 SEDGWICK LLP 5 6 By: /s/ Arameh Zargham O'Boyle 7 Arameh Zargham O'Boyle Ralph A. Campillo 8 Wayne A. Wolff Attorneys for Defendants 9 Howmedica Osteonics Corp (sued as Howmedica 10 Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics), Stryker Corporation and 11 Stryker Sales Corporation DATED: January 25, 2013 LEVIN SIMES LLP 13 14 By: /s/ Rachel Abrams 15 Rachel Abrams William A. Levin 16 Lauren L. Simes Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sandra Viens 17 and Lawrence Viens
IT IS SO ORDERED
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.