Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Teresa Duncan v. the Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 29, 2013

TERESA DUNCAN,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION; LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY,
DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM

On January 28, 2013, Plaintiff submitted a Second Request to Seal Documents, in which she seeks to file under seal "Plaintiff's Exhibit 3[,]" which consists of "excerpts from Defendant Lorillard Tobacco Company's employee benefit plan SPDs." (Pl.'s Notice of Req. to Seal, 1:22-24, ECF No. 109.)

Plaintiff's sealing request is premised upon the incorrect legal standard and is therefore denied. See Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665, 677 (9th Cir. 2010) ("Two standards generally govern motions to seal documents[.]"); Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006) ("[J]udicial records attached to dispositive motions [are treated] differently from records attached to non-dispositive motions. Those who seek to maintain the secrecy of documents attached to dispositive motions must meet the high threshold of showing that "compelling reasons" support secrecy.)

20130129

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.