Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Randolph Diaz v. M. Martel

January 30, 2013

RANDOLPH DIAZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
M. MARTEL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 7, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein (ECF No. 30) which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 7, 2012 (ECF No. 30) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;

3. Defendant Smith is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice; 4. Summary judgment in favor of Defendant Hashimoto is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's pendent state law claims for damages; and

5. This action shall proceed against Defendant Hashimoto based on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim.

DATED:

20130130

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.