IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 30, 2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
JUVANY HERRERA-FELIX, DEFENDANT
STIPULATION REGARDING ) EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER
SPEEDY TRIAL ACT (PROPOSED) FINDINGS AND ORDER
Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and the defendant, JUVANY HERRERA-FELIX by and through her counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on January 31, 2013. 2. By this stipulation, the defendant now moves to continue the status conference until March 14, 2013, and to exclude time between January 31, 2013 and March 14, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. under Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: a. The parties represent that defendant is out of custody and waives time for the continuance.
b. Counsel for the defendant desire additional time to consult with his client to discuss potential resolutions.
c. Furthermore, defendant has just had a baby and lives out of State. Additionally, defense counsel's father passed away on January 26, 2013 and he has been out of town since that date.
d. Counsel for the defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny him the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
e. The government does not object to the continuance. f. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendants in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
g. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of January 31, 2013 to March 14 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
Respectfully submitted, Date: 1-30-13 By: /s/ Danny D. Brace, Jr., DANNY D. BRACE, JR., Attorney for Juvany Herrera-FeliX Date: 1-30-13 By:/s/ Todd Leras Authorized to sign for Mr. Leras On January 30, 2013 TODD LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.