IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 31, 2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
GERARDO ARREDONDO DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: William B. Shubb
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DATE
FOR HEARING OF MOTIONS;
Date: February 19, 2013
Time: 9:30 a.m.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and MARK J. REICHEL, Esq., attorney for defendant, that the present dates for the motions hearing be re calendared for February 19, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.
The parties also stipulate and agree that the briefing schedule shall be amended as follows:
Defense Reply: February 8, 2013 Government sur reply: February 13, 2013 All counsel and defendant agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date this stipulation is lodged through the date of the hearing date now scheduled of February 19, 2013, should be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (H)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, and local code (e) as motions are pending.
DATED: January 31, 2013. Respectfully submitted, MARK J. REICHEL, ESQ. /s/ MARK J. REICHEL MARK J. REICHEL Attorney for defendant BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney DATED: January 31, 2013. /s/MARK J. REICHEL for: JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff
IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that there is GOOD CAUSE for the continuance and the exclusion of time, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.