Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Herman Garcia Sandoval v. William Knipp

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 31, 2013

HERMAN GARCIA SANDOVAL, PETITIONER,
v.
WILLIAM KNIPP, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 17, 2012, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. To date, petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss nor a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ."

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order, why respondent's December 17, 2012 motion to dismiss should not be granted. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

14 sand2489.46.osc.hab

20130131

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.