Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Jose Antonio Murillo-Camacho

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 4, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOSE ANTONIO MURILLO-CAMACHO, AKA JOSE MURILLO-CAMACHO, AKA ANTONIO CAMACHO, AKA ANTONIO MURILLO, AKA ANTONIO MURILLO CAMACHO, AKA ANTONIO JOSE MURILLO, DEFENDANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANTONIO JOSE MURILLO, DEFENDANT.

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME PERIODS UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

The parties appeared before the undersigned for a status conference on January 29, 2013, and requested that the matter be continued to March 5, 2013, for a status conference. This case has been ordered related to the case of United States v. Murillo, 2:05-cr-00165 LKK (E.D. Cal.), in which a petition for violation of supervised release has been filed. However, defendant has not yet made an initial appearance in Murillo, and the parties would prefer to resolve both related cases in a single proceeding.

The parties represent that they require time to proceed in the Murillo case with a view toward resolution of the related cases at the same time. On the basis of counsel's representations and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that time from the January 29, 2013 status conference to and including the March 5, 2013 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, to allow defense counsel time to prepare.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 4, 2013 Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ Nirav K. Desai NIRAV K. DESAI Assistant United States Attorney

20130204

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.