Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Darryl Hubbard v. Hougland

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 6, 2013

DARRYL HUBBARD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HOUGLAND, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Allison Claire United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner when he filed this action and proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on plaintiff's complaint, filed June 10, 2011, against defendants Smith, Clark, Goulding, and Thompson. On November 29, 2012, a modified discovery and scheduling order issued setting January 25, 2013 as the discovery deadline. ECF No. 45. Following issuance of that order, plaintiff propounded discovery on defendants. In plaintiff's now-pending January 22, 2013 motion to compel, plaintiff contends defendants have failed entirely to respond to his discovery requests. Defendants have not responded to the instant motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's motion to compel within seven days from the date of this order.

20130206

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.