Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Powertech Technology Inc., A v. Tessera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


February 11, 2013

POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC., A
TAIWANESE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TESSERA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ) SHORTENING THE BRIEFING AND ) HEARING SCHEDULE FOR POWERTECH ) TECHNOLOGY INC.'S MOTION TO STAY 14 ) PROCEEDINGS (D.I. 220)

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Tessera, Inc. ("Tessera") and Powertech Technology Inc. ("PTI") respectfully request an Order shortening the briefing and hearing schedule for Plaintiff 3 Powertech Technology Inc.'s Notice of Motion And Motion To Stay Proceedings. D.I. 220. 4 PTI's Motion to Stay seeks an order staying the effect of this Court's January 18, 2013 5 order, which affirmed Judge Legge's order regarding production of materials PTI contends are 6 protected from discovery because they are privileged and covered by the common interest 7 doctrine, while PTI files a petition for writ of mandamus in the Ninth Circuit. PTI's Motion for 8 Stay is currently set for hearing on March 21, 2013. The parties agreed to extend the fact 9 discovery cut-off in this case to April 4, 2013. Tessera believes the documents subject to PTI's 10 Motion to Stay may affect depositions and other fact discovery in this case, and PTI does not 11 oppose Tessera's desire to resolve the issues raised by the Motion to Stay on an expedited basis to 12 determine whether a motion to stay needs to be requested from the Ninth Circuit.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court shorten the briefing and hearing 14 schedule on PTI's Motion to Stay as follows: 15 16 Motion: Thursday, February 7, 2013 (already filed) 17 Opposition: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 18 Reply: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 Hearing: Thursday, February 21, 2013 Concurrently filed with this motion is the Declaration of Laura A. Seigle, in accordance 22 with Civil L.R. 6-2(a).

ENDORSEMENT PER CIVIL L.R. 7-12

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED, except that no hearing will be

necessary.

Dated: 2/12/2013 Hon. Claudia A. Wilken United States Chief District Judge 5 6 7 8 Dated: February 11, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 9 IRELL & MANELLA LLP By: /s/ Laura A. Seigle 10 Laura A. Seigle 11 Attorneys for Defendant Tessera, Inc. 12 BAKER BOTTS LLP 13 By: /s/ David M. Genender David M. Genender 14 Attorneys for Defendant Tessera, Inc. ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I, Laura A. Seigle, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulated Request for Order Shortening the Briefing and Hearing Schedule for Powertech Technology Inc.'s Motion to Stay Proceedings has been obtained from David M.

Genender, counsel for PTI.

Laura A. Seigle

Laura A. Seigle

20130211

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.