IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 12, 2013
TOWN OF DANVILLE,
COUNTY OF CONTRA CITY OF PIEDMONT,
DEPUTY CHRISTOPHER BUTLER,
STEPHEN TANABE, DEPUTY TOM HENDERSON,
SERGEANT ANDY WELLS AND DOES 1 TO 50, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT MONA DAGGETT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COSTA, SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Lane Bauldry ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Mona Daggett ("Daggett") (collectively 21 the "Stipulating Parties") hereby stipulate as follows: 22 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation and Order regarding Amendment of Complaint and Responses Thereto dated December 17, 2012 ("Stipulation and Order"), Plaintiff filed his second 24 amended complaint, entitled "Amended Complaint for Damages for Violations of Civil Rights and 25 Other Wrongs" (hereinafter "Second Amended Complaint"), on January 4, 2013; 26 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation and Order, and a further stipulation and order of the Court dated January 28, 2013, Daggett's current deadline for responding to the Second Amended 28 Complaint is February 8, 2013;
WHEREAS, since Plaintiff filed Second Amended Complaint, the Stipulating Parties have 2 continued to discuss this action and have agreed to extend the deadline for Daggett to answer or 3 otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint to, and including, February 22, 2013; 4
WHEREAS, an extension of time for responding to the Second Amended Complaint is
5 supported by good cause as it will not prejudice any party to this action and does not interfere with 6 any court-mandated deadlines; THEREFORE, the Stipulating Parties request that the Court extend the deadline for Daggett 8 to respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint from February 8, 2013 to, and including, 9 February 22, 2013. 10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: February 8, 2013 DUANE MORRIS LLP 12 11 By: /s/ Allegra A. Jones 13 Allegra A. Jones Attorneys for Defendant 14 MONA DAGGETT Dated: February 8, 2013 THE HALEY LAW OFFICES 17 By: /s/ Matthew Haley Matthew Haley Attorneys for Plaintiff
ATTESTATION: Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the 22 filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories thereto. 23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.