Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ajit Kaur, et al. v. Eric Holder

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 13, 2013

AJIT KAUR, ET AL.
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ERIC HOLDER, ET AL.
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUE ABEYANCE.

This is an immigration case in which plaintiffs have challenged the denial of their applications for adjustment of status by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS). The case is currently in abeyance as the plaintiffs pursue nunc pro tunc asylum applications. Plaintiffs have recently been interviewed in conjunction with these applications, and adjudication is expected shortly. Accordingly, the parties agree that good cause exists to continue to hold the case in abeyance pending an administrative resolution to the matter. Accordingly, the parties stipulate to an additional abeyance period of 90 days, and will file a joint status report by June 4, 2013. All other filing deadlines are suspended until that time.

DATED: February 12, 2013 Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney _/s/ Audrey B. Hemesath_____ Audrey B. Hemesath Assistant U.S. Attorney /s/ Robert Louis Volz Robert Louis Volz Attorney for Plaintiffs

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and, good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the matter is held in abeyance. The parties shall file a joint status report by June 4, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20130213

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.