Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ipventure, Inc. v. Asustek Computer Inc. and Asus Computer International

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 14, 2013

IPVENTURE, INC.
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. AND ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Jeffrey S. White

[COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE] 3 4 5 6 7 8

JOINT STIPULATION RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON

Plaintiff IpVenture, Inc. and Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International (collectively "ASUS"), by and through their respective counsel of record, 20 respectfully submit this stipulation to the Court's continuing and rescheduling the Case 21 Management Conference currently scheduled for February 15, 2013. This stipulation is made 22 with reference to the following facts and circumstances: IpVenture filed its Third Amended Complaint. D.I. 161. Pursuant to the Court's order, the 26 ASUS Defendants have fourteen days to file their response. D.I. 159 at 7. ASUS has not yet 27 28

Case No.: 3:12-cv-04143 JSW

JT STIP RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

On January 30, 2013, the Court entered an order granting ASUS's motion to dismiss IpVenture's Second Amended Complaint, with leave to amend. D.I. 159. On February 12, 2013, determined the content of its response, namely whether ASUS will file an answer or pursue 2 additional motion practice. 3

In the interests of judicial efficiency and economy, the parties do not object to the Court 5 continuing the case management conference until after the defendants have had an opportunity to 6 review IpVenture's Third Amended Complaint and file their response. Deferring the conference 7 for approximately forty-five days (e.g., to either March 29 or April 5, 2013) would provide 8 sufficient time should ASUS's response be a motion; and deferring the conference until March 8, 9

In light of the foregoing, the parties hereby stipulate to the Court taking the February 15, 2013 conference off calendar and rescheduling it to a date convenient for the Court as set forth 12 above. 13

Dated: February 14, 2013 By: /s/ Richard Birnholz 14 IRELL & MANELLA LLP Morgan Chu (State Bar No. 70446) mchu@irell.com Richard M. Birnholz (State Bar No. 151543) rbirnholz@irell.com Babak Redjaian (State Bar No. 185506) bredjaian@irell.com 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276 Telephone: (310) 277-1010 Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 Dated: February 14, 2013 By: /s/ Michael J. Engle Counsel for Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International John P. Schnurer jschnurer@perkinscoie.com Michael J. Engle mengle@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 11988 El Camino Real, Suite 200

A case management conference is currently scheduled for February 15, 2013. D.I. 155.

2013 provides sufficient time in the event ASUS answers the Third Amended Complaint.

Counsel for Plaintiff IpVenture, Inc.

ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Pursuant to stipulation, the February 15, 2013 case management conference is hereby vacated. The case management conference shall be reset for ___________.

March 29, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.

[In addition, the Court makes the further orders stated below:]

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20130214

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.