Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

C.K.B. (A Minor) By and Through Her Next Friends R.T.B. (Father) and C.L.B. (Mother v. Dixie School District

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 15, 2013

C.K.B. (A MINOR) BY AND THROUGH HER NEXT FRIENDS R.T.B. (FATHER) AND C.L.B. (MOTHER), PLAINTIFF,
v.
DIXIE SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND
THOMAS J. LOHWASSER, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT OF THE DIXIE SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND
PATRICIA F. ELLIOT, IN HER INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL OF DIXIE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND MILLER CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL, AND, GREG JOHNSON, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS FORMER PRINCIPAL OF MILLER CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL.
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Richard G. Seeborg United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE PROPOSED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND VACATING HEARING RE PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS

The parties to this action, through their respective attorneys of record herein, enter into this Stipulation subject to the Court's approval, with reference to the following circumstances: 3

1. On January 24, 2013, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ("Motion") [Dkt. No. 32]. 5

2. On February 1, 2013, the parties stipulated, and the Court ordered, that Plaintiff 6 would provide Defendants a proposed Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") by February 7, 2013, 7 and that Defendants would inform Plaintiff on February 11, 2013 whether Defendants would 8 stipulate to Plaintiff's filing of her proposed TAC, and whether Defendants would withdraw their 9 pending motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"). [Dkt. No. 34.] 10

3. On February 11, 2013, the parties' counsel met and conferred regarding Plaintiff's 11 proposed TAC, but determined they needed additional time to confer with their respective clients. 12

4. On Thursday, February 14, 2013, Defendants agreed to stipulate to Plaintiff's filing 13 of her proposed TAC on the condition that Defendants would not have to respond to the TAC until 14 thirty days following the date the Court approves this stipulation. 15

5. A copy of Plaintiff's proposed TAC is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties, pursuant 17 to Local Rules 6-1(a), 6-2, and 7-12, that: 18

1. Within 10 days following the Court's entry of an order approving this stipulation, Plaintiff shall file her proposed TAC. 20

2. Defendants shall file their response to the TAC no later than thirty days following 21 the date on which Plaintiff files her proposed TAC. 22

3. The March 14, 2013 hearing on Defendants' motion to dismiss the SAC, and all 23 related filing deadlines, shall be vacated. 24

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February 15, 2013 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP By: /s/ Trenton H. Norris Trenton H. Norris Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: February 15, 2013 STUBBS & LEONE By: /s/ Claudia Leed Claudia Leed Attorneys for Defendants

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing 12 of this document has been obtained from the above signatories. 13

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130215

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.