IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 15, 2013
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,
SIERRA EQUIPMENT RENTAL, INC., ET AL. DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
Presently pending before the court is a motion to compel filed by plaintiff Arch Insurance Company. (Dkt. No. 78.) The motion seeks to compel defendant Carolyn S. Scarola, as Trustee of the Dry Creek Ranches Trust (the "Trust") to (1) permit inspection of documents and things responsive to certain document requests contained in plaintiff's Requests for Production to the Trust served on July 20, 2012, and (2) produce a witness for deposition in accordance with plaintiff's Notice of Deposition of the Trust pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) served on October 18, 2012. (Dkt. Nos. 78, 82.) A hearing on the motion was initially noticed for January 17, 2013, and plaintiff and defendant Trust filed their joint statement and supporting documentation regarding the motion on January 10, 2013, in accordance with Local Rule 251. (Dkt. No. 79, 82.) However, during a brief telephonic conference with counsel for plaintiff and defendant Trust on January 16, 2013, the hearing was continued until February 21, 2013 to allow the parties additional time to resolve their discovery dispute and resolve certain issues related to the bankruptcy filings by some of the other defendants. (Dkt. No. 85.) To date, the parties have not filed a supplemental joint statement apprising the court of the status of the motion to compel.
In light of the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. No later than Tuesday February 19, 2013, at 12:00 p.m., plaintiff and defendant Trust shall file a joint statement identifying specifically what issues, within the scope of the presently pending motion to compel, remain for resolution, if any. Unless pertinent to any development in their negotiations and meet-and-confer efforts, the parties need not submit further briefing regarding the remaining substantive issues that have already been briefed in the initial joint statement. Failure to timely file the joint statement will result in an order denying the motion to compel without prejudice.
2. In the alternative, if the parties have resolved their dispute regarding issues within the scope of the presently pending motion to compel, plaintiff shall file a notice withdrawing the motion no later than Tuesday February 19, 2013, at 12:00 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.