Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Geoffrey Peterson and Brandon Gsa Miller v. Walgreen Company and Does 1 Through 100

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 19, 2013

GEOFFREY PETERSON AND BRANDON GSA MILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
WALGREEN COMPANY AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

AMENDED ORDER AFTER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

On February 12, 2012, a scheduling conference was held. Plaintiffs' counsel Craig Ackerman, and Defendant's counsel, Diana Tabacopoulos and Jill Porcaro appeared telephonically. The scheduling conference was continued until March 12, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. *fn1

No later than five (5) court days prior to the next hearing, the parties shall submit a joint scheduling report. In the joint scheduling report, the parties shall address the following 1) Whether Defendant will stipulate to the filing of Plaintiff's amended complaint filed on February 5, 2013 (if this issue is not already resolved);

2) Whether any dispositive motions are anticipated, a proposed deadline for the filing of such motions, and a proposed schedule for any discovery related to the motions; and

3) If dispositive motions will not be filed, the parties shall submit proposed dates for the completion of class certification discovery and the filing of class certification motions. The parties are advised that the Court requires thirty (30) days between the filing of the motion, the opposition, and any reply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.