Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Robert M. Ross v. Lockheed Martin Corporation and Does 1 Through 50
February 20, 2013
ROBERT M. ROSS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh Judge of the United States District Court
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND (PROPOSED) ORDER THEREON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Robert M. Ross (hereafter referred to as "Ross") and defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation (hereafter referred to as "LMC") that:
1. Plaintiff Ross and defendant LMC have agreed to resolve the case at bar on mutually acceptable terms and have executed a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release setting forth the terms of their agreement;
2. As part of their settlement, the parties have agreed that plaintiff Ross will dismiss his complaint with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41; and
3. The parties have agreed that each will bear its own costs and attorney fees.
Dated: February 15, 2013 DANIEL F. PYNE HOPKINS & CARLEY By: /s/ Daniel F. Pyne Attorney for Plaintiff ROBERT ROSS Dated: MICHAEL W. FOSTER FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW By: /s/ ______________ Michael W. Foster Attorneys for Defendant LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Based on the foregoing stipulation, and for good cause shown, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...