UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 21, 2013
ROBERT E. OSUNA ET AL.,
WILLIAM D. GORE, IN HIS OFFICIAL PRIVATE CAPACITY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel United States District Judge
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 4)
On September 25, 2012, Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendants, asserting various foreclosure related claims. (ECF No. 1.)
On October 18, 2012, defendants William D. Gore and San Diego County Sheriff's Department filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 4.) This Court set Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for a hearing on March 1, 2013, and issued a briefing schedule requiring any response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to be filed on or before November 16, 2012. (ECF No. 5.) To date, the Court has received no response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss from Plaintiffs.*fn1 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as unopposed. See CivLR 220.127.116.11; see also Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Failure to follow a district court's local rules is a proper ground for dismissal."). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, currently set for March 1, 2013, is VACATED.