Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lupe Hernandez, Manuel Hernandez v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 21, 2013

LUPE HERNANDEZ, MANUEL HERNANDEZ, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS SUCCESSOR IN-INTEREST TO CHASE MANHATTAN CORPORATION, NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge

O

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS [Dkt. Nos. 8 & 12]

Presently before the court is Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank NA's Motion to Dismiss, joined by Defendant Northwest Trustee Services Inc. Because Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition, the court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss.

Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that "[t]he failure to file any required paper, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion."

The hearing on Defendants' Motion was set for February 28, 2013. Plaintiffs' opposition was therefore due by February 4, 2013. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition, or any other filing that could be construed as a request for a continuance. Accordingly, the court deems Plaintiffs' failure to oppose as consent to granting the Motion to Dismiss, and GRANTS the Motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130221

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.