IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
February 27, 2013
VLADIMIR BALAREZO; ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
NTH CONNECT TELECOM, INC. ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge
*E-FILED: February 27, 2013*
NOT FOR CITATION
ORDER CONTINUING THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSIONS, AND REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE RE: IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS
United States District Court For the Northern District of California
1. The Pretrial Conference, and all related matters currently set or purportedly "noticed" 15 for March 1, 2013 at 1:30 pm, are continued to March 13, 2013 at 9:30 am. 16
2. By 9:00 am March 11, 2013, the parties shall e-file (and simultaneously deliver 17 courtesy copies to chambers) the following: 18
a) A witness list that actually complies with paragraph B(8)(f) of the Court's 19 Standing Order Re: Pretrial Preparation ("Standing Order");
b) An exhibit list that actually complies with Paragraph B(8)(g) of the Standing 21 Order (including, if applicable, particularized objections to opposing-party 22 exhibits, as required by paragraph C(4) of the Standing Order);
c) An estimate of trial time that actually complies with paragraph B(8)(i) of the 24 Standing Order;
d) A joint set of proposed jury instructions that actually complies with paragraph 26 B(5) of the Standing Order;
e) A "Relief Prayed" statement by plaintiffs that actually complies with paragraph B(8)(h) of the Standing Order; and
f) A verdict form from plaintiffs as required by paragraph B(6) of the Standing 2 Order.
3. By 1:00 p.m. on March 8, 2013, the parties shall submit to chambers, but not e-file:
a) Copies of each party's FRCP 26(a) and 26(e) disclosures; and
b) In a 3-ring binder, properly numbered and tabbed, each side's proposed exhibits. Plaintiffs are allotted numbers 1-100. Defendants exhibits will begin with number 101. Number each page of multi-page exhibits.
4. Furthermore, at the time of the Pretrial Conference, each side shall show cause why 9 sanctions should not be imposed for the following:
a) Failing to schedule, as ordered on August 8, 2012, a Settlement Conference 11 with Judge Grewal to take place before the Pretrial Conference;
b) Failing to meet and confer as required in the Standing Order;
c) Failing to make the joint submissions required by the Standing Order;
d) Failing to address fully and responsively each requirement in the Standing Order;
e) Failing to timely deliver courtesy copies to chambers of pretrial e-filings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
C07-05243 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Adam Wang firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com 3 Brad Yamauchi byamauchi@MinamiTamaki.com, cparker@MinamiTamaki.com, 4 firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org 5 Glicel E Sumagaysay email@example.com 6 Kevin Robert Allen firstname.lastname@example.org 7 Tomas Eduardo Margain Tomas@LaCasaLegal.com, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org 8 2 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not 9 registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.