UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
February 27, 2013
TRI-STAR ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., PLAINTIFF
PRECI-DIP DURTAL SA, DEFENDANT. PRECI-DIP DURTAL SA, COUNTER-CLAIMANT,
TRI-STAR ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., COUNTER-DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Gary A. Feess U.S. District Judge
The Honorable Gary A. Feess
The Honorable Andrew J. Wistrich Fact Discovery Cut-Off: April 26, 2013
Pretrial Conference: TBD Start of Trial: TBD
FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, Tri-Star Electronics International, Inc. ("Tri-Star") and Defendant and Counter-Claimant, Preci-Dip SA, sued as Preci-Dip Durtal SA ("Preci-Dip"), having stipulated that the Non-Final Judgment of Non-Infringement entered by this Court on July 6, 2012 may be made Final and that the remaining Counterclaims filed by Preci-Dip, namely, Count I and Counts III through VI be dismissed without prejudice, and good cause appearing for granting the Stipulation:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: That the electrical contacts of Preci-Dip identified in Tri-Star's Second Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions [Docket Nos. 129 and 129-1, filed November 22, 2011] do not infringe Claims 1-3, 7, 13 and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,250,974, as those claims have been construed by the Court; that Preci-Dip's Counterclaims for Declaration Of Non-Infringement (Count 1), Federal Unfair Competition (Count III), Violation Of The California Unfair Competition Act (Count IV), California Common Law Unfair Competition (Count V), and Interference With Contractual Relations And Prospective Business Advantage (Count VI) be, and hereby are dismissed without prejudice; and, that this case is otherwise terminated with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.