Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gcube Insurance Services, Inc., A California Corporation v. Lindsay Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 27, 2013

GCUBE INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
LINDSAY CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANT.

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

Plaintiff GCube Insurance Services, Inc. ("GCube") brought this action against defendant Lindsay Corporation, Inc. ("Lindsay") arising out of defendant's provision of A-frame supports for a Solar Steam Generation array ("SSG array"). Presently before the court is defendant's motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14(a) for leave to file a third-party complaint against Areva Solar, Inc., Ausra CA I, LLC, now known as Areva Solar CA I, LLC, Special Services Contractors, Inc., Lloyd W. Aubry Co., Inc., Material Integrity Solutions, Inc., and Zoes one through fifty. (Docket No. 14.) Plaintiff opposes the motion as to parties Areva Solar, Inc. and Areva Solar CA I, LLC. (Docket No. 15.)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14(a) provides in pertinent part:

A defending party may, as third-party plaintiff, serve a summons and complaint on a nonparty who is or may be liable to it for all or part of the claim against it. But the third-party plaintiff must, by motion, obtain the court's leave if it files the third-party complaint more than 10 days after serving its original answer.

Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 14(a). "The decision whether to implead a third-party defendant is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court." Sw. Adm'rs, Inc. v. Rozay's Transfer, 791 F.2d 769, 777 (9th Cir. 1986).

Defendant argues that for several reasons the third-party complaint will be futile and/or unnecessary. The preferred procedure for litigating these questions, however, is to allow the third-party complaint to be filed and to permit the third-party defendants to raise those questions in the context of a motion to dismiss, motion for summary judgment, or other appropriate procedural vehicle. The court will grant defendant's motion for leave to file a third-party complaint as to all requested parties without prejudice to the right of those parties to bringing any appropriate motion raising the issues plaintiff has sought to raise in its opposition to defendant's request.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's motion for leave to file a third-party complaint be, and the same hereby, is GRANTED.

20130227

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.