Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nicholas Moran v. K. Dutra

February 27, 2013

NICHOLAS MORAN,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
K. DUTRA, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge

ORDER VACATING ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RE-ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF Nos. 12, 13, & 15)

Plaintiff Nicholas Moran ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations, recommending dismissal of certain of Plaintiff's claims and Defendants. (ECF No. 12.) The Court adopted the Findings and Recommendations before the time for objections had run. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff filed objections on October 18, 2012. (ECF No. 15.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court's October 10, 2012 order adopting the Findings and Recommendations, filed September 21, 2012 (ECF No. 13) is VACATED;

2. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 21, 2012, are adopted in full; 3. Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his Eighth Amendment inadequate medical care claim against Defendants Ryan and Dedee;

4. Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendants Dutra and Auten;

5. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants John Does # 1-20 be dismissed; and 6. Defendants John Does #1-20 be dismissed from this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130227

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.