UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 28, 2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
IVAN LINGHON DELACRUZ, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: William B. Shubb
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ) CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE TO ) APRIL 22, 2013, AT 9:30 A.M. ) Date: April 22, 2013 ) Time: 9:30 a.m.
THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for March 4, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., and reset it for April 22, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.
Counsel for defendant requires further time to review discovery, to review a proposed plea agreement, and to confer with his client.
The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through April 22, 2013, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4.
Dated: February 28, 2013 Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender /s/ M.Petrik MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys IVAN LINGHON DELACRUZ Dated: February 28, 2013 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ M.Petrik for Michelle Prince MICHELLE PRINCE Assistant U.S. Attorney
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on April 22, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.