IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 1, 2013
KIRBY MARTENSEN, PLAINTIFF,
WILLIAM KOCH AND DOES 1-25, INCLUSIVE,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jacqueline Scott Corley United States Magistrate Judge
United States District Court Northern District of California
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT
Now pending before the Court are Defendant's motions to (1) dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (i) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction; (ii) under Rule 22 12(b)(3) for improper venue, or in the alternative, to transfer the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to 23 the Southern District of Florida or to the District of Colorado; and (iii) under Rule 12(b)(6) for 24 failure to state a claim for relief; and (2) strike Plaintiffs' punitive damages allegations in Paragraph 25 23 of the Complaint and Paragraph 2 of the Prayer for Relief, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 12(f). (Dkt. No. 14.) After having the benefit of oral argument on February 28, 2013, and in light of Plaintiff's request to amend the Complaint and the Court's conclusion that such amendment would 28 not necessarily be futile, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend.
Defendant's motion to strike Plaintiff's punitive damages allegations is accordingly DENIED as 2 moot. 3
An amended complaint, if any, shall be filed no later than March 14, 2013. Defendant shall 4 file his motion to dismiss any amended complaint no later than March 28, 2013. The hearing on 5 Defendant's motion to dismiss the amended complaint shall occur on April 25, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. In 6 addition, a Case Management Conference ("CMC") is set for April 25, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. A joint 7 CMC statement shall be filed by April 18, 2013. 8 9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.