Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Andrew Driskel v. State of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 1, 2013

ANDREW DRISKEL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Carolyn K. Delaney United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

By an order filed January 24, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to submit an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Dkt. No. 3.) The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has neither submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the appropriate filing fee. The two documents plaintiff filed within that period do not appear to constitute attempts to comply with the order. (Dkt. Nos. 5, 6.) Plaintiff has consented to this court's jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 4.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

20130301

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.