Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Benjamin Philip Cannon v. City of Petaluma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 7, 2013

BENJAMIN PHILIP CANNON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF PETALUMA, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION FOR "ADMINISTRATIVE CLARIFICATION" Re: Dkt. No. 148.

This Court ordered Plaintiff Benjamin Philip Diaz Cannon to submit a corrected Third Amended Complaint by February 25. Dkt. No. 145. Rather than comply with this order, Plaintiff 15 has instead filed a "Second Motion for Administrative Clarification." Dkt. No. 148 (dated February 23 but filed February 27). In it, Plaintiff requests the same clarification that the Court 17 already provided in response to Plaintiff's first request. See Dkt. Nos. 143 & 145. 18 The court has already clarified its prior orders, and can only counsel plaintiff to follow the 19 directives in the court's prior orders. See id. Plaintiff is again ordered to correct the proposed 20 Third Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 144, so that it complies with the Court's previous orders, 21 especially by removing any references to factual allegations which relate to dismissed claims. 22

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, is advised that helpful information is available online 2 at http://cand.uscourts.gov/proselitigants and also in person at the legal help center. An 3 appointment at the legal help center may be made by calling 415-782-9000, extension 8657. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130307

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.