IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 7, 2013
MARCIANO PLATA, ET AL.,
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Thelton E. Henderson United States District Court Judge
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR COLLECTION OF UNDISPUTED ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FOR 2011 THROUGH FIRST QUARTER OF 2012
IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED
On December 17, 2002, this Court established a procedure by which plaintiffs are 21 to collect attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with the Stipulation for 22 Injunctive Relief. This procedure requires plaintiffs' counsel to submit to defendants a 23 quarterly statement of fees incurred in monitoring work, and permits defendants thirty (30) 24 days from the receipt of plaintiffs' statement to notify plaintiffs of any disputed items. 25
After the parties meet and confer on any of defendant's objections, counsel shall then 26 prepare a stipulated order for payment of the fees not subject to defendants' objections. 27
The Order also states that defendants shall have thirty (30) days from the entry of the order 28 to pay the undisputed fees and that interest on any undisputed fees will run from the thirty-2 first day after the Order is filed, accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 3 4 defendants for work performed during the second, third and fourth quarters of 2011 and 5 for the first quarter of 2012. The parties reached stipulations for those quarters, and this Pursuant to this procedure, plaintiffs' counsel initially served billing statements to Court entered those orders. See Docket Nos. 2419, 2431, 2441 and 2475. 8 incomplete for the period June 16, 2011, 2011 through March 31, 2012, as they omitted 9 work performed for proceedings before the Three Judge Court. Because the parties had 10 previously stipulated to delay plaintiffs' claims for Three Judge Court-related work 11 pending the United States Supreme Court decision in this action (Dkt. No 2321), plaintiffs 12 tracked those billings separately. Following the Supreme Court's decision, the parties 13 reached a settlement for the pre-decision fees that covered plaintiffs' billings through June 15, 2011. (See Dkt. No. 2406.) Since the period covered by that order, plaintiffs counsel 15 continued to record billing hours for Three Judge Court work separately from other Plata 16 billing, and inadvertently omitted those hours from the quarterly billing statements 17 submitted to defendants for Plata work. Plaintiffs explained this omission to opposing 18 counsel, immediately after discovering it, in an email dated January 11, 2013. 19 20 stipulations for billing during the covered periods that settled those fees, under Rule 21 60(b)(1), a court may relieve a party from an order because of "mistake, inadvertence, 22 surprise or excusable neglect." Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1), In re Wagstaff, 3 Fed.Appx. 612, 23 614 (9th Cir. 2001). When considering such relief, the Court should weigh "(1) the danger 24 of prejudice to the adverse party; (2) the length of any delay and its potential impact on the 25 proceedings; (3) the reason for the delay; and (4) whether the moving party acted in good 26 faith." Wagstaff, at 614. These factors favor relief from the previous orders in this 27 instance. 28
Amended Stipulation and Order Re: Collection of Fees Plata v. Brown, No. C-01-1351 T.E.H. 2 Plaintiffs subsequently discovered, however, that the billing statements were Although this Court has previously entered orders approving the parties' Following a meet and confer, the parties agreed to payment of $15,239 in 2 undisputed fees and costs billed by plaintiffs' counsel for work before the Three Judge 3 Court on this action. This stipulation fully settles all costs and fees for this period. 4
WHEREFORE, defendants agree to pay plaintiffs' counsel $15,239 within 30 days 5 of the signing of this Order. On the 31st day following the entry of this Order, interest on 6 any unpaid amount will begin to accrue at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 (i.e., the 7 weekly average 1 year constant maturity Treasury yield for the calendar week preceding 8 the date of the Order.) 9 10
AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES: 11 Date: March 6, 2013 /s/ 12 Alison Hardy Attorney for Plaintiffs 13 14 Date: March 6, 2013 /s/ Kyle A. Lewis Supervising Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Defendants
I, Alison Hardy, attest that Kyle Lewis signed this document on March 6, 2013.
ES D ST T RI A CT S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.