Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Aaron Howard Thomas v. andrew Espinoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 7, 2013

AARON HOWARD THOMAS
v.
ANDREW ESPINOZA, JR., SERGEANT, CITY OF BARSTOW POLICE DEPT., ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Present: The Honorable Frederick F. Mumm, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

James Munoz None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None Present None Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

On September 14, 2012, this Court entered an Order Dismissing the Complaint with Leave to Amend. Plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. On November 16, 2012, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause regarding Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute ("OSC"), a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. Plaintiff was granted until November 30, 2012 to respond to the OSC. As of the date of this order, plaintiff has neither filed a first amended complaint nor filed a response to the OSC.

The Court, sua sponte, will provide plaintiff with one additional opportunity to file his amended complaint. Therefore, unless plaintiff shows cause in writing within 15 days of the date of this order why the action should not be dismissed, the Court will issue a Report and Recommendation recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer JM

20130307

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.