Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

William P. Garcia, Plaintiff v. R. Tolson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 7, 2013

WILLIAM P. GARCIA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
R. TOLSON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY COURT WHETHER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL FIFTEEN DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff William P. Garcia ("Plaintiff") is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's first amended complaint, filed May 24, 2010, against Defendants K. Allison, F. Diaz, D. Ibarra, S. Knight, C. Palmer, R. Santos, R. Tolson, K. Turner, and C. Walters for violation of the First Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000.

Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff and Defendants are each to file a written response indicating whether a court settlement conference would be beneficial in resolving this action. If both parties agree, the Court will issue a further scheduling order setting this matter for settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge or District Judge from the United States District Court, Eastern District of California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130307

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.