Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ammiel Cornish v. Jim Macdonald

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 8, 2013

AMMIEL CORNISH, PETITIONER,
v.
JIM MACDONALD, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for all purposes. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); Local Rule 305(a). (See Dkt. Nos. 6, 12.)

Last fall, petitioner failed to file an opposition to respondent's September 25, 2012 motion to dismiss, premised on exhaustion and statute of limitations grounds. On November 5, 2012, this court informed petitioner of his omission, and directed petitioner to file an opposition, or statement of non-opposition, to respondent's motion within fourteen days. (Dkt. No. 15.) Petitioner was informed that his "[f]ailure . . . to timely respond to this order will be construed as a request for voluntary dismissal of this action without prejudice." (Id. at 2.) Petitioner did not respond to the court's order or otherwise communicate with the court. The court construes petitioner's inaction as a request that this action by dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

SO ORDERED.

corn1296.dism.

20130308

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.