IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
March 11, 2013
RAMON BOJORQUEZ SALCIDO,
KEVIN CHAPPELL, WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON AT SAN QUENTIN, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURAL MATTERS RELATED TO THE MIXED FINALIZED PETITION (DOC. 41)
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Court adopts their proposed schedule for resolving procedural matters related to the mixed finalized petition (Doc. 41).
1. Within 30 days of the issuance of this Order, respondent shall file a motion to dismiss the mixed petition. See O'Bremski v. Maass, 915 F.2d 418, 420 (9th Cir. 1990); see also Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 522 (1982) (holding that for reasons of comity and federalism, district 25 courts may not adjudicate mixed petitions).
2. Within 30 days of the filing of respondent's motion to dismiss the mixed petition, petitioner shall file his response and his motion for a stay so that he may present his unexhausted 28 claims to the state court. See Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 273-78 (2005) (affirming the authority of district courts to stay, rather than dismiss, mixed petitions governed by AEDPA 2 deadlines); see also Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2002).
3. Within 14 days of petitioner filing his response to the motion to dismiss and motion for a stay, respondent shall file any reply to the response to the motion to dismiss and his response to 5 the motion for a stay.
4. Within 14 days of respondent's reply/response to the motion for a stay, petitioner shall file any reply to the response to the motion for a stay.
5. The above motions will be decided on the pleadings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: __________________, 2013.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.