UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 14, 2013
THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF(S),
BCI BUILDERS, INC., DENE BUSTICHI, AND MELODIE M. BUSTICHI, ET AL. DEFENDANT(S).
The opinion of the court was delivered by: United States Magistrate Magistrate Judge The Honorable Howard R. Lloyd
*E-FILED: March 14, 2013*
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes: ☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process: ☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.
☐ other requested deadline
I, James D. Curran, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to efile this Joint Stipulation. I hereby attest that Michael G. Ackerman concurred in this efiling.
☐ The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties shall hold the ADR session by the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of this order).
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.