Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ravy Vanny et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

March 15, 2013

RAVY VANNY ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC., SANOFI- AVENTIS U.S., INC., SANOFI- SYNTHELABO, INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION, AND DOES 1 TO 100,
DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Susan Illston

ORDER

STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE DATE OF CASE MANAGEMENT ) CONFERENCE

Date: March 22, 2013 Time: 2:30 p.m. Judge: Hon. Susan Illston 23

U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc., and Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), by and 4 through the undersigned counsel of record,*fn1 with reference to the following facts:

This Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiffs in Vanny v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., No. CV-12-5752 SI (N.D. Cal.), and Defendants Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Sanofi-Aventis 3

1. WHEREAS, on November 5, 2012, Plaintiffs filed the Vanny action in the Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, and on November 8, 2012, Defendants removed the 7

2. WHEREAS, the case management conference in the Vanny action is set for March 22, 2013, with a joint case management conference statement due on March 15, 2013; 10

3. WHEREAS, on November 13, 2012, Plaintiffs filed an unopposed motion to relate 11 the Vanny action to ten other Plavix® actions pending before Judge Edward M. Chen; 12 13 Vanny action to this Court; 8

4. WHEREAS, on February 12, 2013, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") established a Plavix® multidistrict litigation in the District of New Jersey; 14 15 action to state court, and Defendants opposed the motion on February 28, 2013; 16 17 action to the Plavix® MDL, and on February 26, 2013, Plaintiffs opposed the JPML's conditional 18 transfer of the Vanny action to the Plavix® MDL; 19

5. WHEREAS, on February 14, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand the Vanny

6. WHEREAS, on February 20, 2013, the JPML conditionally transferred the Vanny

7. WHEREAS, on February 28, 2013, Defendants filed concurrent motions to stay the Vanny action and to shorten time for hearing on the motion to stay, and Plaintiffs opposed the 21 motions on March 4, 2013; 22 23 motion to stay are pending before this Court; the motion to relate is pending before Judge Chen; and 24 the motion to vacate the conditional transfer order is pending before the JPML; 25 26 management conference would promote the efficient use of judicial resources; 27

8. WHEREAS, the motion to remand, to stay, and to shorten time ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.