IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 18, 2013
TROY TEE TAYLOR, PETITIONER,
SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
Petitioner consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On February 12, 2013, petitioner was ordered to file, within thirty days, an in forma pauperis affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, or his application would be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate filing fee.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and
2. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.