Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lucile Packard Children's Hospital At Stanford Christine Deeths, An Individual v. Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital At Stanford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 19, 2013

LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD CHRISTINE DEETHS, AN INDIVIDUAL, PLAINTIFF(S),
v.
LUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; JOHN STIRLING, JR., INDIVIDUALLY; CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER, A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION; CHRISTOPHER HARRIS, INDIVIDUALLY; BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; ANTHONY THOMAS, INDIVIDUALLY; LEGACY BEHAVIORAL SERVICES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; TARA CRUZ, AN INDIVIDUAL; EDDIE CRUZ, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jennifer L. Thurston United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Doc. 13)

The parties to this action, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), the time for defendant LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD to respond to plaintiff Christine Deeths' Complaint for Damages is hereby extended by 28 days. The new deadline to file a response to the complaint is now April 16, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 13, 2013 SHEUERMAN, MARTINI, TABARI, ZENERE & GARVIN 3 4 By: /s/ DAVID SHEUERMAN MONIQUE SHAMUN-KHASHO Attorneys for Defendant LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD Dated: March 13, 2013 THE LAW OFFICES OF SHAWN A. McMILLAN, APC By: /s/ SHAWN A. McMILLAN Attorneys for Plaintiff CHRISTINE DEETHS

ORDER

Before the Court is the third stipulation of the parties to allow Defendants additional time to file their responsive pleading. (Doc. 13) There was no explanation provided in the first or second stipulation why these extensions were needed and none is provided here. Therefore, the Court ORDERS:

1. Defendants SHALL file their responsive pleading no later than April 16, 2013. No further extensions will be authorized;

2. The mandatory scheduling conference is CONTINUED to June 10, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130319

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.