UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 21, 2013
ANTHONY DEAN SLAMA,
CITY OF MADERA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER SETTING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATES
On March 1, 2013, counsel for Plaintiff Anthony Dean Slama ("Plaintiff") and Defendants City of Madera, et al. ("Defendants") submitted a Joint Scheduling Report (Doc. 155) providing proposed pre-trial conference and trial dates pursuant to the Court's January 30, 2013, order in preparation for the March 26, 2013, scheduling conference. (Doc. 150, 154.)
The parties have indicated that they expect the trial to last five days and have proposed trial dates beginning the week of July 2, 9, or 16, 2013. (Doc. 155, p. 2.) District Judge Anthony W. Ishii has multiple trials currently set for those weeks and thus is not available for trial on the dates proposed by the parties.
The first available date without a trial presently scheduled on District Judge Ishii's calendar is November 13, 2013. As such, the trial in this action is reset for November 13, 2013, and the pre-trial conference is reset for October 2, 2013.
The parties are informed that District Court Judges in the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California now have the heaviest caseload in the nation, and that each judge will be scheduling multiple trials to begin on each available trial date. Civil cases will "trail" other cases with little or no notice. Moreover, since the law requires that criminal trials be given priority, if a civil trial such as this one is set to begin while a criminal trial is proceeding, the civil trial will trail the completion of the criminal trial. Additionally, in response to its large caseload, the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California will be assigning its cases, whenever possible, to Article III District Court Judges from around the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random and without advance notice.
The parties are reminded of the availability of the United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings in this action. A Magistrate Judge is available to conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. The same jury pool is used by both United States Magistrate Judges and District Court Judges. Since Magistrate Judges do not conduct felony trials, they have greater flexibility in scheduling firm dates.
As such, the parties are once again informed that, if they consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto will be able to set firm pre-trial conference and trial dates, and will also be able to provide a trial date prior to November 2013. District Judge Ishii has previously informed the parties that he cannot guarantee that the dates set will not be continued due to his heavily impacted trial calendar. (See Doc. 142.) Thus, the dates provided in this scheduling order are not firm, as the trial could trail other trials or be reassigned at random to a Visiting Judge. The Court encourages the parties to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction for all further proceedings in this matter, including trial.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Scheduling Conference set for March 26, 2013, is VACATED;
2. The pre-trial conference is RESET for October 2, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before District Judge Ishii; and
3. The trial is RESET for November 13, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before District Judge Ishii.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.