UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 21, 2013
TRAVELL DARNELL POGUE,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE OPPOSITION OR NOTICE OF NON) OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER'S
MOTION TO AMEND THE PETITION NO LATER ) THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE
DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER(DOC. 30)
ORDER PERMITTING PETITIONER TO FILE A REPLY TO ANY OPPOSITION FILED BY RESPONDENT NO LATER THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THE OPPOSITION
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303. Pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion to amend the petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was construed as such by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin and was directed to be filed in the instant action. (Docs. 29-30.)
Respondent shall FILE opposition or notice of non-opposition to the motion no later than thirty (30) days after the date of service of this order.
Petitioner may FILE a reply no later than thirty (30) days after the date of service of any opposition by Respondent to the motion to amend.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.