The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge
DANNY D. BRACE, JR., #114466 LAW OFFICE OF DANNY D. BRACE, JR. 901 H Street, Suite 500 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 552-6660 Fax: (916) 447-0592 Attorney for Mark Allen Cline
STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT (PROPOSED) FINDINGS AND ORDER
Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and the defendant, MARK ALLEN CLINE, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on March 22, 2013.
2. By this stipulation, the defendant now moves to continue the status conference until April 5, 2013, and to exclude time between March 22, 2013 and April 5, 2013 under Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a. Counsel for the defendant desires additional time to consult with his client regarding a change of plea.
b. Additionally, defense counsel just finished a lengthy trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court, and was assigned a trial court room in Sacramento County Superior Court on March 20, 2013 for a two week criminal trial.
c. Counsel for the defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny him the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
d. The government does not object to the continuance.
e. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendants in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
e. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of March 22, 2013, to April 5, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from ...