Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Conopco, Inc. v. P E Rubaloff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 25, 2013

CONOPCO, INC.
v.
P E RUBALOFF, CO., INC., ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Kronstadt, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Andrea Keifer Not Reported

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL RE LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than April 8, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff shall file an application for the entry of default. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of an application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause.

The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to file respond will result in the dismissal of this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer ak

20130325

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.