Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Paris Hilton,Et Al. v. Abm Perfume

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 25, 2013

PARIS HILTON,ET AL.
v.
ABM PERFUME,ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable John A. Kronstadt, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Andrea Keifer Not Reported

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL RE LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiffs to show cause in writing no later than April 8, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs shall file an application for the entry of default. Plaintiffs are advised that the Court will consider the filing of an application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause.

The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to file respond will result in the dismissal of this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130325

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.