Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jerry Fernandez v. United States of America

March 27, 2013

JERRY FERNANDEZ,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge

STIPULATION REQUESTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER RITE AID CORPORATION, (AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT)

The parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On May 19, 2012, the Court entered its Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order for the case. Docket 12.

2. The scheduling order set the following deadlines for this case:

Plaintiff's Expert Witness Disclosure March 1, 2013 Defendants' Expert Witness Disclosure March 29, 2013 Supplemental/Rebuttal Expert Witnesses April 26, 2013 Joint Mid-Litigation Statement June 7, 2013 Discovery Cutoff June 21, 2013 Dispositive Motions (filed by) August 14, 2013 Dispositive Motions (heard by) September 11, 2013 Joint Pretrial Conference Statement October 4, 2013 Final Pretrial Conference October 11, 2013 Trial Briefs November 25, 2013 Trial December 9, 2013

3. Plaintiff disclosed expert witnesses on March 1, 2013 and, on March 6, 2013, he made a settlement demand. The parties have agreed to request extensions of the remaining expert disclosure deadlines to allow time for defendants to do due diligence and analysis in light of plaintiff's disclosures and settlement demand. They also have agreed to request a settlement conference, which the parties believe may be helpful to resolve this case. The parties believe that good cause exists for the Court to modify its scheduling order to accommodate the parties' request for a settlement conference before any additional expert disclosures are required, since the conference may result in settlement of the case.

4. The parties respectfully request that a settlement conference be held in mid-April 2013. The parties do not wish to waive disqualification of Magistrate Judge Claire to hear discovery matters, and they respectfully request that the Court assign another magistrate judge to the settlement conference.

5. The parties further request that the Court modify the scheduling order as follows:

Old Date New Date Defendants' Expert Witness Disclosure March 29, 2013 April 26, 2013 Supplemental/Rebuttal Expert Witnesses March 5, 2013 May 10, 2013 Joint Mid-Litigation Statement June 7, 2013 Discovery Cutoff June 21, 2013 Dispositive Motions (filed by) August 14, 2013 Dispositive Motions (heard by) September 11, 2013 Joint Pretrial Conference Statement October 4, 2013 Final Pretrial Conference October 11, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.

Trial Briefs November 25, 2013 Trial December 9, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

Since the parties are not asking the Court to modify the dispositive motion, pretrial, or trial dates at this time, the requested modification of the scheduling order will not prejudice any party, and should not negatively impact the Court's schedule for this case. However, if it is not possible to have a mid-April 2013 settlement conference, then the case schedule may need to be further modified to accommodate the settlement conference.

Respectfully submitted, DATED: March 26, 2013 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: /s/ Lynn Trinka Ernce LYNN TRINKA ERNCE Assistant United States Attorney DATED: March 26, 2013 JESSE L.B. HILL DOUGLAS MALCOLM By: /s/ Jesse L.B. Hill JESSE L.B. HILL Attorneys for Plaintiff DATED: March 27, 2013 MANNING & KASS, ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP By: /s/ Martin D. Holly MARTIN D. HOLLY Attorneys for Defendant THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC. dba RITE AID

ORDER

Based on the foregoing, and good cause ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.